|
To top
APPROACH
There were four phases to the
research design.
Phase
1: an extensive literature review and analysis of
documentation on community initiatives
Phase
2: interviews with key people in organisations
leading or managing community programmes.
23
‘national level’ interviews were completed covering 12
programmes or networks with the term community in their
rationale or remit – nearly double the number originally
envisaged because of the diversity of initiatives that were
identified and the need to capture a range of perspectives
on recent policy and practice.
Phase
3: construction of an extensive database of community energy
projects
A
database was constructed and made available on the web (see
link above). In our
proposal we estimated that there were approximately 80
‘community projects’ in the UK. This proved to be a gross
underestimate as the database finally contained 509 projects
in total (as of December 2004). Our approach was to include
renewable energy projects in the database that were
supported by a programme or network that has the word
‘community’ within its rationale or remit. It includes
available
factual information about each project (from web, programme
data and other sources). We were not able to fill all of the
fields in the database as we had to rely on what information
was easily accessible and could not verify its accuracy or
reliability. With necessary caveats, the database provided a
useful snapshot of projects that we could use to
inform case study selection and a simple statistical
analysis provided a profile of activity supported by
initiatives by technology type, region and initiative.
Phase
4: case studies of community renewable energy
projects.
Six
case study projects covered a
variety of renewable resources and technologies, scales of
development and institutional structures. They all had
successfully installed renewable technology, and reported
high levels of community involvement or beneficial outcomes
in each place, as indicated by materials produced by the
project organisers. Key aspects of each project are
summarised in the following table:
Key
aspects of the six cases study projects
|
Location |
Technology context |
Institutions |
Funding |
|
Llanwyddn |
Biomass
district heating network linking school and
community centre plus 19 local houses |
Public-private partnership |
£375,000 |
|
Moel
Moelogan |
3 grid
connected 1.3MW wind turbines (phase 1), later
increased to 12 (phase 2) |
3 local
farmers |
£2.6
million |
|
Bro Dyfi |
One 75kW
wind turbine, grid connected |
Committee-co-operative |
£83,555 |
|
Kielder |
Biomass
district heating network linking school, youth
hostel, 6 houses, workshop and castle |
Public
sector, local council |
£630,000 |
|
Falstone |
Solar
photovoltaic panel and biomass boiler in village
shop, tea rooms and visitor centre |
Public
sector partnership |
£250,000 |
|
Gamblesby |
Ground
source heat pump for renovation project on
village hall |
Village
hall committee |
£42,100 |
Case study
research involved interviews at local and regional levels
and questionnaires with members of the public in the
communities in which the projects are located (were all
relatively small and rural). In total 41 local level and 15
regional interviews were undertaken. The
case study research was undertaken in 2005-6.
208
questionnaires were completed (a 31% response rate out of
the 676 surveys distributed which varied little across the
six places). The survey was designed with a mixture of
open-ended and closed questions. Analysis of the
questionnaire utilised a variety of statistical techniques.
|